Choosing an Orderly Exit in the Pet Care Industry

The European pet care market has seen significant growth in recent years, driven by premiumization, digital services, and changing consumer behavior. In this context, a young startup, referred to here as Project Willow, was launched with the ambition of building a technology-enabled pet care platform combining services, subscriptions, and localized operations.

The vision was attractive. Market realities proved more complex.

The challenge

Project Willow had progressed beyond the idea stage. The company had:

  • Built an initial product and service offering

  • Tested demand in several local markets

  • Engaged in early discussions with partners and potential investors

However, as operations unfolded, several structural issues emerged:

  • Customer acquisition costs were significantly higher than initially projected

  • Unit economics remained negative despite multiple pricing and operational adjustments

  • Operational complexity grew faster than revenues in a fragmented local services market

  • The capital required to reach break-even exceeded realistic fundraising prospects

The founding team faced a critical question: continue raising capital to sustain uncertainty, or reassess the viability of the model.

Our intervention

Genki International was engaged under an advisory mandate internally referred to as Project Clearpath.

The objective was not to force continuation, but to provide an independent, fact-based assessment of the company’s strategic options.

1. Objective business and financial assessment

Under Project Lens, we worked with management to:

  • Reassess unit economics under multiple realistic scenarios

  • Stress-test growth assumptions and capital requirements

  • Evaluate operational scalability and risk exposure

This analysis removed emotional bias and clarified the true economic profile of the business.

2. Scenario analysis and decision support

Through Project Crossroads, we supported the founders in evaluating three scenarios:

  • Aggressive continuation with additional fundraising

  • Partial pivot with reduced scope and market presence

  • Orderly wind-down and closure of operations

Each scenario was assessed against capital needs, execution risk, and shareholder impact.

3. Executing an orderly closure

Once the decision to close the company was made, under Project Resolve we assisted with:

  • Structuring a controlled wind-down plan

  • Managing stakeholder communication (employees, partners, shareholders)

  • Preserving value where possible through asset and IP disposition

  • Ensuring legal, financial, and reputational matters were handled properly

The focus shifted from growth to responsibility and clarity.

Key outcomes

As a result of this process, Project Willow achieved:

  • A timely and controlled closure, avoiding value-destructive last-minute decisions

  • Transparent communication with all stakeholders

  • Protection of founders’ and shareholders’ reputations

  • Valuable strategic and operational learnings carried forward into future ventures

While the company did not continue, the decision prevented deeper losses and enabled the founders to move forward with clarity and credibility.

Précédent
Précédent

Structuring Growth in a Regulated Consumer Industry